I, like a few others that I know, first got introduced to the PF world via Fabulously Broke. For me, reading her blog was like reading a story of who I wanted to be — successful, pushy (but just enough to get what I’m owed) and financially stable. When she sold her blogs I thought nothing of it because a) she had a new blog and b) she would still guest post from time to time.
I didn’t like the guest posters/staff writers/new owners whatever. I generally don’t read blogs that have multiple authors because I feel that the essence of the blog is lost — there’s no personality to follow and I have no feelings of remorse or joy whenever anything personal happens to the writers. While personal(ality) is pretty important in a personal finance blog, I kept Fabulously Broke in my reader for sentimental reasons.
Plus, on the occasions that FB did write, I still enjoyed reading her posts (FB commented below saying that the “guest posts” are pre-written posts that she sold along with the blog).
This morning however, was the last straw. Today’s post was “Should women work in male dominated professions?” and, while I really, really tried to give it a chance, this line immediately turned me off of the post, Shawanda and Fabulously Broke forever:
[Why women shouldn't do dirty work]: “Personally, I’m not super eager to chip my finger nails, sweat out my hairdo, or catch offensive odors in my hair and pores during a standard day’s work.”
Excuse me? I go to arguably one of the best universities in the world (and #1 in Canada!) where I’ve worked my ass off every day to get good grades, graduate in 2.5 years and work full-time to increase my net worth and I have no problem “chip[ping] my finger nails, sweat[ing] out my hairdo, or catch[ing] offensive odors in my hair and pores during a standard day’s work”.
I don’t think that I’m above a hard day’s work because I’m a woman or because I have a university degree. I don’t think that I’m overqualified or “too good” to work a blue-collar job. Hell, I worked a blue-collar, union job for 5 years where I left every damn day covered in dust and with dirt under my fingernails. But, I did it because it was a decent paycheque and it was a job. I hated most of the things about it but I was smart enough to know that it was either work there for $15 an hour or work at a grocery store for $10 an hour. In my crazy world of priorities I thought that a bit of dirt and dry, dry skin that I will never get soft again is worth the extra thousands a year.
I firmly believe that that statement is what is holding women back in pay equality. Once I move to Alberta, I’d love to get an office job and wear pretty shoes but if I find a job shoveling sand that pays a significant amount more and provides me with free work clothes, you’ll bet that I’ll take that. Women who are more per-occupied with messing up their hair or smelling funny have their employment choices limited and are forced to take lower paying jobs.
I’ll bring my example one step farther, a stay-at-home mom is looking for a part-time job. She can a) work at a minimum wage job or b) work at a slightly less feminine job (maybe in a mail room or as a warehouse worker) and a few dollars more per hour. Which will she choose? Which would you choose?
For a more articulate post, go read Cassie’s rebuttal.
Subscribe to my posts
Tagsadvance advanced basic bills book review budget budgeting calgary economics edmonton emergency fund etc europe fun Giveaway goals goal setting guest post intermediate investing life Links loans london math meme money pit montreal motivation paycheques personal quebec random random thoughts recap review school spending recap sponsored stop b!tching travel tricks vacation weekly updates winnipeg
ING Orange Key